A quick tongue-in-cheek checklist for assessing usefulness of media stories on risk
Do you shout at the morning radio when a story about a medical “risk” is distorted, exaggerated, mangled out of all recognition? You are not alone. Kevin McConway and David Spiegelhalter, writing in Significance, a quarterly magazine published by the Royal Statistical Society, have come up with a checklist for scoring media stories about medical risks. Their mnemonic checklist comprises 12 items and is called the ‘John Humphrys’ scale, said Mr Humphrys being a well-known UK radio and television presenter.
They assign one point for every ‘yes’ and do a test on a story about magnetic fields and asthma, and another about TV and length of life. The article, called Score and Ignore: A radio listener’s guide to ignoring health stories, is here.
Could form the basis of a useful classroom resource.
Stephanie Budgett is a senior lecturer in the department. See all posts by Stephanie Budgett »
Comments
Add a comment
First time commenting? Please use your real first name and surname and read the Comment Policy.

Unfortunately, the article is not freely available. Another example of why we need to push for open access.
109 days ago
Ahem … do a search on the title and you might just find a copy .on an academic’s website …
109 days ago
Not that this implies we don’t need open access!
109 days ago
Brendon, you are quite right!
109 days ago