September 28, 2025
Briefly
- From the Guardian: Exclusive: Study gives 85.7% probability Badminton House version of The Lute Player is by 17th-century master. As I said about a previous rating from the same company, there’s no way this probability is meaningful to three significant digits (except potentially to the computer). The company’s head, Dr Carina Popovici, told the Guardian: “Everything over 80% is very high.” which is, um, reasonable. Importantly, we’re not told any of the “compared to what” information. Is this 85.7% considering that it was previously described as fake and doesn’t have good provenance, or it is 85.7% if the painting was selected from a training set of half real and half fakes. Or what?
- From The Xylom via Flowing Data, a map of H1B visa holders at US universities, including what fraction of the research budget it would take to keep hiring at the same rate under the new rules. I’m not sure the research budget is the right comparison — yes, a lot of H1B’s are postdoctoral researcher, but I was in a regular academic job when I had an H1B.

- Voting has just closed in Bird of the Year, the only online bogus clicky poll endorsed by StatsChat. Bird of the Year takes a lot more care than most online bogus polls to clamp down on virtual ballot-box stuffing. Its results are more trustworthy than the typical online clicky poll. You should definitely be more confident that it’s identified the truely most popular bird in Aotearoa than you are that the average unweighted opt-in survey is telling you the truth.
Thomas Lumley (@tslumley) is Professor of Biostatistics at the University of Auckland. His research interests include semiparametric models, survey sampling, statistical computing, foundations of statistics, and whatever methodological problems his medical collaborators come up with. He also blogs at Biased and Inefficient See all posts by Thomas Lumley »