December 13, 2018

Or you’ll go blind?

Almost exactly one year ago, my glasses got broken. I went to a nice optometrist, had an eye exam, and got new glasses.  Apart from my recurring surprise that the lenses have to come all the way from Australia everything was fine. I’ve now had five emails telling me that my next eye exam is “due”, that this sort of regular checkup is “very important” and that it enables the “early detection of a number of eye health problems … making successful treatment more likely”.

The New Zealand medical guidelines for someone in my situation suggest that I need an eye exam at least once every five years, primarily to detect glaucoma. The Australian guidelines (PDF) are similar, but recommend starting at 50. In the US, where they really like screening, the American Academy of Ophthalmology says eye exams every 2-4 years.

That’s a bit different from what optometrists will tell you. The American Optometric Association says ‘at least every two years’ — though they don’t explain their evidence base for this — and the main NZ chains agree. One interesting exception is the College of Optometrists, in the UK, which recommends that you wait a minimum of two years if there isn’t any special reason for more frequent examination.

It’s quite hard to work out optimal screening frequency, but it does look here as though the people who describe how have they tried to consider costs and benefits carefully come up with longer intervals than people who don’t.

avatar

Thomas Lumley (@tslumley) is Professor of Biostatistics at the University of Auckland. His research interests include semiparametric models, survey sampling, statistical computing, foundations of statistics, and whatever methodological problems his medical collaborators come up with. He also blogs at Biased and Inefficient See all posts by Thomas Lumley »

Comments

  • avatar
    Nick Iversen

    Yesterday I got both OCT and an eye fundus image – total cost $30. Given that early detection of the three major diseases Glaucoma, Macular Degeneration, and Diabetic Retinopathy works best I’m happy to pay that amount every year.

    The biggest danger is false positives. But a nice time series of images should help reduce that risk.

    5 years ago

    • avatar
      Thomas Lumley

      I wouldn’t have minded a single email reminder, though I think that all the people who *didn’t* have an eye exam within the past year would be likely to benefit more.

      Six (now) attempts is excessive, and must border on both misleading advertising and spam.

      5 years ago