Posts from February 2021 (18)

February 15, 2021

Vaccines and testing

The current NZ Covid restrictions happened because someone at risk of infection in their job developed symptoms consistent with Covid and got tested.   With the first load of Pfizer vaccines arriving today, that raises a question about testing.

All the current vaccines seem to do best at preventing serious illness and death, and slightly less well at preventing mild illness. We don’t have really good data on preventing asymptomatic illness, but the information we have suggests that the trend continues and they’re somewhat less effective at preventing asymptomatic illness.  For most purposes that’s a great tradeoff — Covid is a global catastrophe only because people get sick and die, that’s how it’s different from the common colds caused by other coronaviruses.  For preventing border incursions things are more complicated.

When we vaccinate the first target group — people working at the border, the highest-risk healthcare workers, and their household contacts — we dramatically reduce the chance they will get sick or die from Covid, and we reduce, less dramatically, the chance they will get infected and pass the virus on.  We should expect fewer cases of the virus getting past the regular workplace testing — but when it does, it’s less likely to be stopped by someone stepping up and getting a test on their own.  Outbreaks are likely to be bigger by the time we see them, with a higher risk of needing lockdowns.

This doesn’t mean we shouldn’t vaccinate border workers. The whole point of the vaccine is to stop people getting sick and dying, and that’s how we should use it. The answer isn’t to use MIQ workers as coal-mine canaries. We do need to think about how to change testing to respond to the new circumstances.  Many experts have already been calling for more frequent testing of high-risk workers, ideally using new saliva-based tests to reduce the ouch factor.  The case for more-frequent tests will be much stronger as we progressively vaccinate the people at highest risk and become less likely to pick up outbreaks by waiting for people to get sick. 

February 9, 2021

Top 14 Predictions for Round 16

Team Ratings for Round 16

The basic method is described on my Department home page.
Here are the team ratings prior to this week’s games, along with the ratings at the start of the season.

Current Rating Rating at Season Start Difference
Stade Toulousain 8.18 4.80 3.40
Racing-Metro 92 6.78 6.21 0.60
La Rochelle 6.61 2.32 4.30
Clermont Auvergne 4.83 3.22 1.60
RC Toulonnais 4.23 3.56 0.70
Bordeaux-Begles 4.05 2.83 1.20
Lyon Rugby 3.07 5.61 -2.50
Montpellier 1.40 2.30 -0.90
Stade Francais Paris -0.33 -3.22 2.90
Castres Olympique -2.90 -0.47 -2.40
Brive -3.11 -3.26 0.20
Section Paloise -3.57 -4.48 0.90
Aviron Bayonnais -6.00 -4.13 -1.90
SU Agen -12.66 -4.72 -7.90

 

Performance So Far

So far there have been 109 matches played, 70 of which were correctly predicted, a success rate of 64.2%.
Here are the predictions for last week’s games.

Game Date Score Prediction Correct
1 Montpellier vs. Stade Francais Paris Feb 07 31 – 6 9.40 TRUE
2 Clermont Auvergne vs. Lyon Rugby Feb 06 26 – 18 4.50 TRUE
3 Castres Olympique vs. Aviron Bayonnais Feb 08 31 – 21 8.10 TRUE
4 Racing-Metro 92 vs. La Rochelle Feb 08 26 – 22 7.00 TRUE

 

Predictions for Round 16

Here are the predictions for Round 16. The prediction is my estimated expected points difference with a positive margin being a win to the home team, and a negative margin a win to the away team.

Game Date Winner Prediction
1 Aviron Bayonnais vs. Brive Feb 15 Aviron Bayonnais 3.70
2 Bordeaux-Begles vs. Stade Francais Paris Feb 14 Bordeaux-Begles 9.00
3 Castres Olympique vs. Montpellier Feb 14 Castres Olympique 1.70
4 Racing-Metro 92 vs. Lyon Rugby Feb 14 Racing-Metro 92 10.00
5 RC Toulonnais vs. La Rochelle Feb 15 RC Toulonnais 3.30
6 Stade Toulousain vs. Section Paloise Feb 13 Stade Toulousain 15.60
7 SU Agen vs. Clermont Auvergne Feb 14 Clermont Auvergne -9.90

 

Rugby Premiership Predictions for Round 9

Team Ratings for Round 9

The basic method is described on my Department home page.
Here are the team ratings prior to this week’s games, along with the ratings at the start of the season.

Current Rating Rating at Season Start Difference
Exeter Chiefs 6.69 7.35 -0.70
Sale Sharks 4.40 4.96 -0.60
Bristol 4.15 1.28 2.90
Wasps 2.67 5.66 -3.00
Harlequins 1.21 -1.08 2.30
Northampton Saints -1.04 -2.48 1.40
Bath -2.89 2.14 -5.00
Gloucester -3.20 -1.02 -2.20
Leicester Tigers -5.46 -6.14 0.70
London Irish -5.95 -8.05 2.10
Newcastle Falcons -6.17 -10.00 3.80
Worcester Warriors -7.49 -5.71 -1.80

 

Performance So Far

So far there have been 43 matches played, 24 of which were correctly predicted, a success rate of 55.8%.
Here are the predictions for last week’s games.

Game Date Score Prediction Correct
1 Bath vs. Harlequins Feb 07 15 – 28 2.00 FALSE
2 Bristol vs. Sale Sharks Feb 07 13 – 20 5.60 FALSE
3 Leicester Tigers vs. Worcester Warriors Feb 07 41 – 24 5.20 TRUE
4 London Irish vs. Gloucester Feb 07 32 – 26 1.10 TRUE
5 Newcastle Falcons vs. Exeter Chiefs Feb 07 9 – 15 -8.80 TRUE
6 Wasps vs. Northampton Saints Feb 07 17 – 22 9.80 FALSE

 

Predictions for Round 9

Here are the predictions for Round 9. The prediction is my estimated expected points difference with a positive margin being a win to the home team, and a negative margin a win to the away team.

Game Date Winner Prediction
1 Exeter Chiefs vs. London Irish Feb 14 Exeter Chiefs 17.10
2 Gloucester vs. Bristol Feb 13 Bristol -2.80
3 Harlequins vs. Leicester Tigers Feb 14 Harlequins 11.20
4 Northampton Saints vs. Newcastle Falcons Feb 14 Northampton Saints 9.60
5 Sale Sharks vs. Bath Feb 13 Sale Sharks 11.80
6 Worcester Warriors vs. Wasps Feb 15 Wasps -5.70

 

Pro14 Predictions for Postponed Matches

Team Ratings for Postponed Matches

The basic method is described on my Department home page.
Here are the team ratings prior to this week’s games, along with the ratings at the start of the season.

 

Current Rating Rating at Season Start Difference
Leinster 18.18 16.52 1.70
Munster 10.20 9.90 0.30
Ulster 9.09 4.58 4.50
Edinburgh 4.04 5.49 -1.40
Glasgow Warriors 3.08 5.66 -2.60
Connacht 1.35 0.70 0.60
Scarlets 1.16 1.98 -0.80
Cheetahs -0.46 -0.46 0.00
Cardiff Blues -0.65 0.08 -0.70
Ospreys -1.46 -2.82 1.40
Treviso -5.35 -3.50 -1.80
Dragons -8.63 -7.85 -0.80
Southern Kings -14.92 -14.92 0.00
Zebre -15.64 -15.37 -0.30

 

Performance So Far

So far there have been 64 matches played, 44 of which were correctly predicted, a success rate of 68.8%.
Here are the predictions for last week’s games.

 

Game Date Score Prediction Correct
1 Dragons vs. Connacht Feb 06 20 – 30 -2.90 TRUE

 

Predictions for Postponed Matches

Here are the predictions for Postponed Matches. The prediction is my estimated expected points difference with a positive margin being a win to the home team, and a negative margin a win to the away team.

 

Game Date Winner Prediction
1 Dragons vs. Edinburgh Feb 13 Edinburgh -6.90
2 Glasgow Warriors vs. Treviso Feb 14 Glasgow Warriors 14.90

 

February 2, 2021

Vaccines new and very new

First, two new vaccines.  Johnson & Johnson and Novavax put out press releases about their vaccines last week. These are two vaccines that NZ has agreements to buy.  The Novavax vaccine is (a slightly modified version of) the viral spike protein. The mRNA vaccines (Moderna, Pfizer) get your body to make this protein, and the DNA vaccines (AstraZeneca, J&J) get your body to make mRNA to make the protein; a protein vaccine cuts out the middleman.   Novavax are reporting good results, estimating 95% efficacy against the original variants of SARS-2-CoV [?Covid Classic], about 85% against the B 1.1.7 (“UK” variant) and about 60% against the B 1.351 (“South Africa” variant). That’s as good as the mRNA vaccines against the original strains. It might well be as good against the new variants — we don’t have direct randomised trial estimates of effectiveness for the new variants and the mRNA vaccines, but we have antibody tests that suggest substantial but lower protection. Johnson & Johnson didn’t provide much data, and they aren’t claiming as high effectiveness, but they are claiming to prevent serious disease and death, and it’s a single-shot vaccine. We will presumably see more information from both companies when they are evaluated by the FDA and its European counterpart, as we did for earlier vaccines.

Next, the AstraZeneca vaccine in people over 65.  The situation has clarified a bit, though it’s still not clear what number Handelsblatt were quoting.  There is very little Covid data (so far) on people over 65, because there were very few in the trial.  This will improve somewhat when data are released from trials in India and the US.  There is good reason to expect that the vaccine would work in people over 65, but very little direct experience.  In a usual drug-approval situation there is a very strong status-quo bias: the status quo is often not that terrible; the drug doesn’t realistically promise a big improvement; you don’t want to give drug companies incentives to cut corners in trials. Usually it’s better to postpone a decision for a year or so to get better information. With Covid, the status quo is a massive human and economic disaster, and the balance of risks is very different. Leaving people unvaccinated is dangerous, epidemiologically and to the global economy as well as to them personally, so it’s not clear whether the ‘safe’ approach for regulators is to approve the vaccine for all ages or carve out an over-65 exception. It probably depends on the country.

Finally, arithmetic. Israel has been doing well at delivering vaccines, and we’re starting to see rates of infection after vaccination. These aren’t straightforwardly comparable with vaccine efficacy numbers.  A story in the Jerusalem Post has the headline Just 0.04% of Israelis caught COVID-19 after two shots of Pfizer vaccine  and goes on to say (emphasis added)

According to the studies conducted by Pfizer, the vaccine had an efficacy of about 95%, which is considered very high. The Israeli data appear to confirm the inoculation’s effectiveness, showing an even more promising result.Later in the day, Maccabi Healthcare Services – one of the country’s four health maintenance organizations – released the first results of the vaccination campaign of its members, with the organization also comparing the data to a control group that did not get inoculated.
Some 248,000 Maccabi members were already a week after the second shot as of Thursday. Of those, just 66 got infected with the virus, the majority of them over the age of 55 and about half of them with preexisting conditions. All those infected experienced only a mild form of the disease, and none were hospitalized.Over the same period of time, some 8,250 new cases of COVID-19 emerged in the control group of some 900,000 people having a diverse health profile. Those who were not inoculated were therefore 11 times more likely to get the disease than those who were immunized, showing 92% effectiveness.

95% effectiveness means you’d expect 5% of vaccinated people to test positive as infected if 100% of unvaccinated people did. Or 0.05% test positive as infected if 1% of unvaccinated people did. But 1% is a very high rate — the US, at its very worst, wasn’t getting close to 1% of the population as new cases in a week.

Top 14 Predictions for Postponed Games

 

 

Team Ratings for Postponed Games

The basic method is described on my Department home page.
Here are the team ratings prior to this week’s games, along with the ratings at the start of the season.

Current Rating Rating at Season Start Difference
Stade Toulousain 8.18 4.80 3.40
Racing-Metro 92 6.92 6.21 0.70
La Rochelle 6.40 2.32 4.10
Clermont Auvergne 4.63 3.22 1.40
RC Toulonnais 4.26 3.56 0.70
Bordeaux-Begles 4.02 2.83 1.20
Lyon Rugby 3.25 5.61 -2.40
Montpellier 1.05 2.30 -1.30
Stade Francais Paris 0.07 -3.22 3.30
Castres Olympique -3.01 -0.47 -2.50
Brive -3.12 -3.26 0.10
Section Paloise -3.53 -4.48 0.90
Aviron Bayonnais -5.90 -4.13 -1.80
SU Agen -12.67 -4.72 -7.90

 

Performance So Far

So far there have been 105 matches played, 67 of which were correctly predicted, a success rate of 63.8%.
Here are the predictions for last week’s games.

Game Date Score Prediction Correct
1 Brive vs. RC Toulonnais Jan 31 25 – 23 -2.40 FALSE
2 Clermont Auvergne vs. Bordeaux-Begles Jan 30 36 – 37 6.70 FALSE
3 Lyon Rugby vs. Section Paloise Jan 31 17 – 18 12.50 FALSE
4 Montpellier vs. Racing-Metro 92 Jan 30 22 – 24 -0.10 TRUE
5 Stade Francais Paris vs. Castres Olympique Feb 01 29 – 9 7.30 TRUE

 

Predictions for Postponed Games

Here are the predictions for Postponed Games. The prediction is my estimated expected points difference with a positive margin being a win to the home team, and a negative margin a win to the away team.

Game Date Winner Prediction
1 Montpellier vs. Stade Francais Paris Feb 07 Montpellier 9.40
2 Clermont Auvergne vs. Lyon Rugby Feb 06 Clermont Auvergne 4.50
3 Castres Olympique vs. Aviron Bayonnais Feb 08 Castres Olympique 8.10
4 Racing-Metro 92 vs. La Rochelle Feb 08 Racing-Metro 92 7.00

 

Rugby Premiership Predictions for Round 8

Team Ratings for Round 8

The basic method is described on my Department home page.
Here are the team ratings prior to this week’s games, along with the ratings at the start of the season.

Current Rating Rating at Season Start Difference
Exeter Chiefs 6.91 7.35 -0.40
Bristol 4.84 1.28 3.60
Sale Sharks 3.71 4.96 -1.30
Wasps 3.46 5.66 -2.20
Harlequins 0.41 -1.08 1.50
Northampton Saints -1.83 -2.48 0.70
Bath -2.09 2.14 -4.20
Gloucester -2.90 -1.02 -1.90
Leicester Tigers -6.11 -6.14 0.00
London Irish -6.26 -8.05 1.80
Newcastle Falcons -6.40 -10.00 3.60
Worcester Warriors -6.84 -5.71 -1.10

 

Performance So Far

So far there have been 37 matches played, 21 of which were correctly predicted, a success rate of 56.8%.
Here are the predictions for last week’s games.

Game Date Score Prediction Correct
1 Bristol vs. Bath Jan 30 48 – 3 8.00 TRUE
2 Gloucester vs. Northampton Saints Jan 31 26 – 31 4.50 FALSE
3 Leicester Tigers vs. Sale Sharks Jan 31 15 – 25 -4.60 TRUE
4 London Irish vs. Newcastle Falcons Feb 01 31 – 22 4.00 TRUE
5 Wasps vs. Harlequins Feb 01 17 – 49 11.50 FALSE
6 Worcester Warriors vs. Exeter Chiefs Jan 31 17 – 21 -10.00 TRUE

 

Predictions for Round 8

Here are the predictions for Round 8. The prediction is my estimated expected points difference with a positive margin being a win to the home team, and a negative margin a win to the away team.

Game Date Winner Prediction
1 Bath vs. Harlequins Feb 07 Bath 2.00
2 Bristol vs. Sale Sharks Feb 07 Bristol 5.60
3 Leicester Tigers vs. Worcester Warriors Feb 07 Leicester Tigers 5.20
4 London Irish vs. Gloucester Feb 07 London Irish 1.10
5 Newcastle Falcons vs. Exeter Chiefs Feb 07 Exeter Chiefs -8.80
6 Wasps vs. Northampton Saints Feb 07 Wasps 9.80

 

Pro14 Predictions for Postponed Matches

Team Ratings for Postponed Matches

The basic method is described on my Department home page.
Here are the team ratings prior to this week’s games, along with the ratings at the start of the season.

Current Rating Rating at Season Start Difference
Leinster 18.17 16.52 1.70
Munster 10.15 9.90 0.20
Ulster 9.07 4.58 4.50
Edinburgh 4.04 5.49 -1.40
Glasgow Warriors 3.10 5.66 -2.60
Scarlets 1.19 1.98 -0.80
Connacht 0.84 0.70 0.10
Cheetahs -0.46 -0.46 0.00
Cardiff Blues -0.60 0.08 -0.70
Ospreys -1.43 -2.82 1.40
Treviso -5.33 -3.50 -1.80
Dragons -8.17 -7.85 -0.30
Southern Kings -14.92 -14.92 0.00
Zebre -15.65 -15.37 -0.30

 

Performance So Far

So far there have been 63 matches played, 43 of which were correctly predicted, a success rate of 68.3%.
Here are the predictions for last week’s games.

Game Date Score Prediction Correct
1 Treviso vs. Munster Jan 31 16 – 18 -6.20 TRUE
2 Scarlets vs. Leinster Jan 31 25 – 52 -11.00 TRUE

 

Predictions for Postponed Matches

Here are the predictions for Postponed Matches. The prediction is my estimated expected points difference with a positive margin being a win to the home team, and a negative margin a win to the away team.

Game Date Winner Prediction
1 Dragons vs. Connacht Feb 06 Connacht -2.90