September 23, 2015

Rugby World Cup Predictions for Week 2

Team Ratings for Week 2

The basic method is described on my Department home page.

Here are the team ratings prior to this week’s games, along with the ratings at the start of the Rugby World Cup.

Current Rating Rating at RWC Start Difference
New Zealand 28.37 29.01 -0.60
South Africa 21.15 22.73 -1.60
Australia 20.36 20.36 0.00
Ireland 18.15 17.48 0.70
England 18.04 18.51 -0.50
Wales 13.35 13.93 -0.60
France 12.10 11.70 0.40
Argentina 8.02 7.38 0.60
Scotland 4.84 4.84 -0.00
Samoa -2.71 -2.28 -0.40
Fiji -3.76 -4.23 0.50
Italy -6.26 -5.86 -0.40
Tonga -7.23 -6.31 -0.90
Japan -9.60 -11.18 1.60
USA -15.54 -15.97 0.40
Georgia -16.56 -17.48 0.90
Canada -18.73 -18.06 -0.70
Romania -21.20 -21.20 -0.00
Uruguay -30.46 -31.04 0.60
Namibia -35.62 -35.62 -0.00

 

Performance So Far

So far there have been 8 matches played, 6 of which were correctly predicted, a success rate of 75%.
Here are the predictions for last week’s games.

Game Date Score Prediction Correct
1 England vs. Fiji Sep 18 35 – 11 29.20 TRUE
2 Tonga vs. Georgia Sep 19 10 – 17 11.20 FALSE
3 Ireland vs. Canada Sep 19 50 – 7 35.50 TRUE
4 South Africa vs. Japan Sep 19 32 – 34 33.90 FALSE
5 France vs. Italy Sep 19 32 – 10 17.60 TRUE
6 Samoa vs. USA Sep 20 25 – 16 13.70 TRUE
7 Wales vs. Uruguay Sep 20 54 – 9 51.50 TRUE
8 New Zealand vs. Argentina Sep 20 26 – 16 21.60 TRUE

 

Predictions for Week 2

Here are the predictions for Week 2. The prediction is my estimated expected points difference with a positive margin being a win to the first-named team, and a negative margin a win to the second-named team.

Game Date Winner Prediction
1 Scotland vs. Japan Sep 23 Scotland 14.40
2 Australia vs. Fiji Sep 23 Australia 24.10
3 France vs. Romania Sep 23 France 33.30
4 New Zealand vs. Namibia Sep 24 New Zealand 64.00
5 Argentina vs. Georgia Sep 25 Argentina 24.60
6 Italy vs. Canada Sep 26 Italy 12.50
7 South Africa vs. Samoa Sep 26 South Africa 23.90
8 England vs. Wales Sep 26 England 11.20

 

NRL Predictions for the Preliminary Finals

Team Ratings for the Preliminary Finals

The basic method is described on my Department home page.

Here are the team ratings prior to this week’s games, along with the ratings at the start of the season.

Current Rating Rating at Season Start Difference
Roosters 13.13 9.09 4.00
Cowboys 9.47 9.52 -0.10
Broncos 8.88 4.03 4.80
Storm 6.15 4.36 1.80
Bulldogs 1.51 0.21 1.30
Sea Eagles 0.46 2.68 -2.20
Dragons -0.09 -1.74 1.60
Rabbitohs -0.24 13.06 -13.30
Raiders -1.13 -7.09 6.00
Sharks -1.65 -10.76 9.10
Panthers -2.78 3.69 -6.50
Eels -5.07 -7.19 2.10
Wests Tigers -5.16 -13.13 8.00
Knights -5.46 -0.28 -5.20
Warriors -7.47 3.07 -10.50
Titans -9.20 -8.20 -1.00

 

Performance So Far

So far there have been 198 matches played, 117 of which were correctly predicted, a success rate of 59.1%.
Here are the predictions for last week’s games.

Game Date Score Prediction Correct
1 Roosters vs. Bulldogs Sep 18 38 – 12 12.80 TRUE
2 Cowboys vs. Sharks Sep 19 39 – 0 10.20 TRUE

 

Predictions for the Preliminary Finals

Here are the predictions for the Preliminary Finals. The prediction is my estimated expected points difference with a positive margin being a win to the home team, and a negative margin a win to the away team.

Game Date Winner Prediction
1 Broncos vs. Roosters Sep 25 Roosters -1.20
2 Storm vs. Cowboys Sep 26 Cowboys -0.30

 

ITM Cup Predictions for Round 7

Team Ratings for Round 7

The basic method is described on my Department home page.

Here are the team ratings prior to this week’s games, along with the ratings at the start of the season.

Current Rating Rating at Season Start Difference
Canterbury 13.67 10.90 2.80
Tasman 11.53 12.86 -1.30
Taranaki 10.21 7.70 2.50
Auckland 7.35 5.14 2.20
Hawke’s Bay 3.83 -0.57 4.40
Wellington 3.66 -4.62 8.30
Counties Manukau 1.06 7.86 -6.80
Otago -2.63 -4.84 2.20
Waikato -6.67 -6.96 0.30
Southland -7.11 -6.01 -1.10
Manawatu -7.82 -1.52 -6.30
Bay of Plenty -7.94 -9.77 1.80
North Harbour -8.78 -10.54 1.80
Northland -14.35 -3.64 -10.70

 

Performance So Far

So far there have been 46 matches played, 32 of which were correctly predicted, a success rate of 69.6%.
Here are the predictions for last week’s games.

Game Date Score Prediction Correct
1 Tasman vs. North Harbour Sep 16 39 – 20 29.30 TRUE
2 Wellington vs. Otago Sep 17 36 – 37 12.80 FALSE
3 Taranaki vs. Waikato Sep 18 41 – 0 16.50 TRUE
4 Hawke’s Bay vs. Bay of Plenty Sep 19 23 – 17 17.90 TRUE
5 Southland vs. Manawatu Sep 19 49 – 14 -1.90 FALSE
6 Northland vs. Counties Manukau Sep 19 17 – 42 -8.40 TRUE
7 North Harbour vs. Canterbury Sep 20 10 – 17 -21.90 TRUE
8 Tasman vs. Auckland Sep 20 19 – 28 12.90 FALSE

 

Predictions for Round 7

Here are the predictions for Round 7. The prediction is my estimated expected points difference with a positive margin being a win to the home team, and a negative margin a win to the away team.

Game Date Winner Prediction
1 Canterbury vs. Waikato Sep 23 Canterbury 24.30
2 Hawke’s Bay vs. Auckland Sep 24 Hawke’s Bay 0.50
3 Northland vs. Bay of Plenty Sep 25 Bay of Plenty -2.40
4 Counties Manukau vs. Tasman Sep 26 Tasman -6.50
5 Otago vs. Southland Sep 26 Otago 8.50
6 Manawatu vs. North Harbour Sep 26 Manawatu 5.00
7 Waikato vs. Wellington Sep 27 Wellington -6.30
8 Canterbury vs. Taranaki Sep 27 Canterbury 7.50

 

Currie Cup Predictions for Round 8

Team Ratings for Round 8

The basic method is described on my Department home page.

Here are the team ratings prior to this week’s games, along with the ratings at the start of the season.

Current Rating Rating at Season Start Difference
Lions 5.01 3.04 2.00
Western Province 4.92 4.93 -0.00
Blue Bulls 1.54 0.17 1.40
Sharks 1.46 3.43 -2.00
Cheetahs -1.59 -1.75 0.20
Pumas -6.55 -6.47 -0.10
Griquas -9.20 -7.81 -1.40
Kings -9.48 -9.44 -0.00

 

Performance So Far

So far there have been 28 matches played, 20 of which were correctly predicted, a success rate of 71.4%.
Here are the predictions for last week’s games.

Game Date Score Prediction Correct
1 Pumas vs. Kings Sep 18 20 – 9 5.90 TRUE
2 Western Province vs. Blue Bulls Sep 18 29 – 14 6.40 TRUE
3 Lions vs. Sharks Sep 19 26 – 18 6.90 TRUE
4 Cheetahs vs. Griquas Sep 19 44 – 24 10.60 TRUE

 

Predictions for Round 8

Here are the predictions for Round 8. The prediction is my estimated expected points difference with a positive margin being a win to the home team, and a negative margin a win to the away team.

Game Date Winner Prediction
1 Sharks vs. Blue Bulls Sep 25 Sharks 3.40
2 Cheetahs vs. Lions Sep 26 Lions -3.10
3 Western Province vs. Pumas Sep 26 Western Province 15.00
4 Kings vs. Griquas Sep 26 Kings 3.20

 

September 22, 2015

Minimum, median

From the Herald

Auckland renters can expect to pay a minimum $400 a week – regardless of property type or size, according to Trade Me Property’s monthly report on median rents across New Zealand.

From a quick TradeMe search for Auckland rentals, with an upper limit of $350 a week: 525 listings.

trademe

What they mean is that the median is at least $400/week in every category of property type or size, not the minimum.  That’s a bit clearer from the press release, which has data tables that the Herald didn’t print, but even that starts

A property renter in Auckland can now expect to pay $400 per week regardless of property size or type

 

 

September 21, 2015

Dominating social media?

dominating

No. No, it isn’t.

According to my searches, maybe half a dozen people asked a version of that question before the Herald headline turned up. If you count the retweets and favourites you might possibly get to twenty.

As a failure to actually search, this might beat the Netsafe CTO saying, a couple of years ago

You type ‘kiwi chicks’ into Google and the images that come back won’t be small feathered birds.”

 

It’s bad enough without exaggerating

This UK survey report is being a bit loose with the details, in a situation where that’s not even needed

stem for boys

The survey of more than 4,000 girls, young women, parents and teachers, demonstrates clearly that there is a perception that STEM subjects and careers are better suited to male personalities, hobbies and brains. Half (51 percent) of the teachers and 43 percent of the parents surveyed believe this perception helps explain the low uptake of STEM subjects by girls. [emphasis added]

Those aren’t the same thing at all.  I believe this perception helps explain the low uptake of STEM subjects by girls. Michelle ‘Nanogirl’ Dickinson believes this perception helps explain the low uptake of STEM subjects by girls. It’s worrying that nearly more than half of UK teachers don’t believe this perception helps explain the low uptake of STEM subjects by girls.

On the other hand, this is depressing and actually does seem to be what the survey said:

Nearly half (47 percent) of the young girls surveyed said they believe such subjects are a better match for boys.

as does this

difficult subjects It would fit with NZ experience if a lot of boys felt the same about the difficulty of science and maths, but that wouldn’t actually make it any better.

 

Stat of the Week Competition: September 19 – 25 2015

Each week, we would like to invite readers of Stats Chat to submit nominations for our Stat of the Week competition and be in with the chance to win an iTunes voucher.

Here’s how it works:

  • Anyone may add a comment on this post to nominate their Stat of the Week candidate before midday Friday September 25 2015.
  • Statistics can be bad, exemplary or fascinating.
  • The statistic must be in the NZ media during the period of September 19 – 25 2015 inclusive.
  • Quote the statistic, when and where it was published and tell us why it should be our Stat of the Week.

Next Monday at midday we’ll announce the winner of this week’s Stat of the Week competition, and start a new one.

(more…)

September 18, 2015

Compared to what? (transport chaos edition)

A while back, it looked as though the negotiations between NZ Bus and its drivers would break down and we would have bus strikes in Auckland. I considered various contingency plans: working from home for all or part of  a day, taking a train to Newmarket or Britomart and walking to the University, cycling, or catching a ride with a colleague who lives nearby. Some of these were options because we would have a week or so of warning before the strike.

If public transport in Auckland became permanently bad — if it went back to its state 20 years ago — I would have different options. I probably wouldn’t live in a house in Onehunga; I’d live in an apartment near the city centre. Moving to the city centre wouldn’t be a sensible response to a single day’s stoppage, but it would be sensible if the lack of buses was permanent.

Transport Blog has a post about the congestion benefits of the Wellington rail system, based on the week in June 2013 that it was taken out by a storm. On weekdays during this period, about 4000 people who would normally take the train into Wellington couldn’t. The roads became much more congested, and these delays can be valued (using plausible-looking assumptions) as worth over $5 million. Scaling this up to a full working year, the benefit to drivers in reduced driving time is worth rather a lot more than the public subsidy to the entire Wellington public transit system.

There’s a problem with simply scaling up the costs. If the Hutt Valley train line didn’t exist, some of those 4000 people would either live somewhere else or work somewhere else. Driving for an extra two hours each way was a rational response by them to a short-term outage, but in the long term they would reorganise their lives to not do it.

Now, there’s obviously a cost to moving from the Hutt to Wellington for these people — otherwise they’d be living in Wellington already — but the cost is less than would be estimated from the travel time during the outage. It’s hard to tell how much less without a lot more data and modelling.

On the other hand, while the storm data almost certainly overestimate the congestion-cost benefits of the train line, the magnitude of the estimated benefit is so large that the conclusion could quite easily hold even with better estimates.

September 17, 2015

Kids these days

I made this graph for a lecture on longitudinal data, then thought I’d share it. It shows the percentage of New Zealanders with post-secondary qualifications, by age and sex (data from 2006). The proportion with qualifications goes down after age 35.

age-cohort-degree

Obviously NZ universities aren’t taking people’s degrees away (except occasionally), so as individual get older, their qualifications either stay the same or increase. The downward trend is a cohort effect — people born in the 1950s are less likely to end up with post-secondary qualifications than people born in the 1970s.  Ten years earlier, the proportion in the 25-34 age group was 14.7% for men and 13.1% for women, so this cohort of people, now 35-44, do have more qualifications than they did ten years ago.

In this case the explanation is obvious, but often news stories talk about Kids These Days and how they should, eg, Get Off Our Lawns The Internet. After checking that the trend is real (a disturbingly important step) it’s worth asking whether the story’s attribution of the problem to age effects or cohort effects is right.