Flying vs driving costs
To complement the Herald’s flying Air New Zealand vs driving costs for various NZ cities, I thought I’d work out similar comparisons for the Pacific Northwest, where I used to live. It’s a reasonable comparison — both have relatively sparsely spaced cities, though the roads are better there.
I used Alaska Airlines for the flying costs; they are the main local airline in the region. The costs are the cheapest flight on a random weekday in September — there will be some days and seasons when it’s cheaper or more expensive. The driving cost is based on the actual driving distance, not the straight-line distance, and uses the cost per mile specified for business tax deductions.
| from | to | distance (km) | US$flying | US$driving | NZ$flying | NZ$driving | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Seattle | Portland | 278 | 368 | 97 | 438 | 116 |
| 2 | Seattle | Spokane | 449 | 398 | 157 | 474 | 187 |
| 3 | Seattle | Calgary | 1146 | 455 | 401 | 542 | 478 |
| 4 | Seattle | Kelowna | 507 | 440 | 177 | 524 | 211 |
| 5 | Portland | Kelowna | 785 | 487 | 275 | 580 | 327 |
| 6 | Spokane | Calgary | 698 | 581 | 244 | 692 | 291 |
The results aren’t that different from NZ, except that the impact of competition is clearer: the Seattle–Calgary flight is much less expensive that you’d predict from the others, probably because there lots of one-stop alternatives via Vancouver.








Recent comments