August 15, 2012

How the Aussies topped the medal table (sort of) …

Wit from the Sydney Morning Herald:

How Australia topped the medal tally

Who was the real winner from the London Olympic Games? According to a ground-breaking analysis of the official medal tally by a BusinessDay statistician, the most successful nation at the Olympics was … Australia!

Statistics can be used to tell a lot more than one story, of course. Other nations will try to claim victory using lesser formulations. Based on the number of athletes per medal, for example, China will claim it is the winner. Despite occasional murmurs of complaint at being fleeced out of gold, the Peoples’ Republic needed just 4.5 athletes to win a medal of any colour.

From its team of 396 athletes, the Chinese needed 10 athletes to win each of their gold medals. Next best among the top 25 nations at the Olympics was the US, which needed 12 athletes for each gold and 5.1 athletes for all medals. The American team was by far the biggest with 530 athletes.

The 410-strong Australian squad required 12 athletes for a medal, and 59 athletes for each gold medal. It has been well publicised that the 2012 Olympics were a bit lacking on the gold medal front, at least by Australia’s historical standards. Naturally, the proponents of sports funding are therefore calling on government to dig deep – to buy some more medals at the next Games.

Read the rest here.

NRL Predictions, Round 24

Team Ratings for Round 24

Here are the team ratings prior to Round 24, along with the ratings at the start of the season. I have created a brief description of the method I use for predicting rugby games. Go to my Department home page to see this.

Current Rating Rating at Season Start Difference
Bulldogs 8.79 -1.86 10.70
Cowboys 4.98 -1.32 6.30
Sea Eagles 4.67 9.83 -5.20
Storm 4.36 4.63 -0.30
Rabbitohs 4.05 0.04 4.00
Knights 2.18 0.77 1.40
Wests Tigers -0.05 4.52 -4.60
Broncos -0.18 5.57 -5.70
Titans -0.33 -11.80 11.50
Sharks -1.90 -7.97 6.10
Raiders -2.38 -8.40 6.00
Warriors -3.50 5.28 -8.80
Dragons -3.76 4.36 -8.10
Eels -5.10 -4.23 -0.90
Roosters -6.44 0.25 -6.70
Panthers -9.12 -3.40 -5.70

 

Performance So Far

So far there have been 168 matches played, 97 of which were correctly predicted, a success rate of 57.74%.

Here are the predictions for last week’s games.

Game Date Score Prediction Correct
1 Rabbitohs vs. Sea Eagles Aug 10 6 – 23 2.50 FALSE
2 Storm vs. Titans Aug 10 24 – 16 9.42 TRUE
3 Eels vs. Roosters Aug 11 36 – 22 4.28 TRUE
4 Wests Tigers vs. Dragons Aug 11 22 – 12 7.87 TRUE
5 Cowboys vs. Warriors Aug 11 52 – 12 7.83 TRUE
6 Panthers vs. Raiders Aug 12 10 – 20 -0.76 TRUE
7 Bulldogs vs. Broncos Aug 12 22 – 14 14.51 TRUE
8 Knights vs. Sharks Aug 13 26 – 4 6.03 TRUE

 

Predictions for Round 24

Here are the predictions for Round 24

Game Date Winner Prediction
1 Broncos vs. Storm Aug 17 Storm -0.00
2 Bulldogs vs. Wests Tigers Aug 17 Bulldogs 13.30
3 Raiders vs. Roosters Aug 18 Raiders 8.60
4 Sharks vs. Rabbitohs Aug 18 Rabbitohs -1.50
5 Titans vs. Eels Aug 19 Titans 9.30
6 Warriors vs. Panthers Aug 19 Warriors 10.10
7 Sea Eagles vs. Knights Aug 19 Sea Eagles 7.00
8 Dragons vs. Cowboys Aug 20 Cowboys -4.20

 

August 14, 2012

London 2012 and data journalism: What did we learn at the Olympics?

Fascinating item in The Guardian, which looks at the Olympics from a data journalist’s point of view …. and does a great job.

 

Numerate Queenstown police.

From the Otago Daily Times:

Over the weekend, police dealt with seven separate incidents involving Australians, including theft, nudity, disorderly behaviour and gross intoxication.

Sergeant Mark Gill said although the numbers appeared to show the Australians behaving badly, it was proportional to Queenstown’s Australian visitor ratio with other nationalities.

The common denominator in many small crimes in Queenstown’s CBD was too much alcohol and that was an issue for the police, Sgt Gill said.

Looking at the rest of his comments, Sgt Gill is clearly trying to stop Queenstown looking dangerous and scaring off tourists, but it’s encouraging whenever we see denominators being used sensibly in public by people who aren’t (as far as I know) trained professionals.

 

 

August 13, 2012

What Wells actually said, in context

The aphorism that adorns StatsChat is actually a paraphrase, by the statistician Samuel Wilks in a 1951 speech, of what H.G. Wells wrote.  The full paragraph from Wells’  Mankind in the Making (1904) is

Modern, too, is the development of efficient mathematical teaching; so modern that for too many schools it is still a thing of tomorrow. The arithmetic (without Arabic numerals, be it remembered) and the geometry of the mediaeval quadrivium were astonishingly clumsy and ineffectual instruments in comparison with the apparatus of modern mathematical method. And while the mathematical subjects of the quadrivium were taught as science and for their own sakes, the new mathematics is a sort of supplement to language, affording a means of thought about form and quantity and a means of expression, more exact, compact, and ready than ordinary language. The great body of physical science, a great deal of the essential fact of financial science, and endless social and political problems are only accessible and only thinkable to those who have had a sound training in mathematical analysis, and the time may not be very remote when it will be understood that for complete initiation as an efficient citizen of one of the new great complex world-wide states that are now developing, it is as necessary to be able to compute, to think in averages and maxima and minima, as it is now to be able to read and write. This development of mathematical teaching is only another aspect of the necessity that is bringing the teaching of drawing into schools, the necessity that is so widely, if not always very intelligently perceived, of clearheadedness about quantity, relative quantity, and form, that our highly mechanical, widely extended, and still rapidly extending environments involve.

In 1904, it was reasonable to describe the analytic techniques needed to make `endless social and political problems’ accessible and to achieve `clearheadedness about quantity, relative quantity, and form’ as “mathematics”.  Today we would usually call these “statistics”, although “numeracy”, or “don’t they teach you anything in school these days” would also be possible translations.

It’s also worth emphasizing, for the benefit of those seeing change and decay in all around, that teaching these basic calculating and thinking techniques in public schools was something Wells was proposing as a major reform in education.

Cybercrime misrepresentation soars

From a story in Stuff

The amount of money Kiwis lost to online dating scams has doubled in the past year and now makes up almost two-thirds of all reported online fraud losses.

which then goes on to say

NetSafe operates a website, theorb.org.nz, in partnership with the police, the Consumer Affairs Ministry and other government agencies which lets people report frauds by clicking on an “online reporting button”.

So it’s not a doubling of cybercrime, it’s a doubling of cyberreporting. A bogus poll, in other words.

We then read

The charity claimed in June that cyber-crime cost the country “as much as $625 million” in financial losses once the time and expense in sorting issues, such as removing malware, was included.

If we simultaneously believed the $625 million and believed that the ‘two-thirds’ from online dating scams was meaningful, that would be $400 million per year from online dating scams, which is ludicrous.  So at least one of these figures is bogus.

In fact, they both probably are. The story goes on to say

The estimate was extrapolated from international surveys carried out by Symantec, which sells security software.

NetSafe consultant Chris Hails acknowledged Symantec’s figures had been questioned and said there was no single source of reliable figures.

The journalist is to be commended for at least forcing this admission.  The figures from people selling computer security products are notoriously inflated; there’s a good description of attempts to track down the sources of these numbers from a recent ProPublica article.

It’s hard to visualise big numbers, so it may not be obvious how extreme the $625 million number is.  For example, it’s more than the total profit from NZ beef exports ($2 billion gross, about 25% profit (p22)) , and it’s more than ACC spends on medical treatment each year.

Stat of the Week Winner: August 4 – 10 2012

Congratulations to Eric Crampton for his nomination of an absolute shocker of a statistic this week. The printed story completely mangled the information in the press release. It even went further and attributed malicious intent to the researchers.

“67 Maori children died avoidable deaths every year, costing taxpayers $200 million annually.”

The original study says that the social costs of health disparities ranges from $62m-$200m, including measures of the value of statistical lives lost among Maori children. In no way is the larger figure close to a “Cost to the taxpayer” except in the odd sense that costs borne by the parents who cared about those children are included in the value of statistical lives lost and some of those parents may have been taxpayers.

Another case of “Economic Impact” or “Social cost” turning into “cost to the taxpayer” when handled by journalists.

Discussed at length:

http://www.tvhe.co.nz/2012/08/06/journalist-ideological-cant-read/

http://www.offsettingbehaviour.blogspot.co.nz/2012/08/i-hate-economic-impact-numbers.html

Stat of the Week Competition: August 11 – 17 2012

Each week, we would like to invite readers of Stats Chat to submit nominations for our Stat of the Week competition and be in with the chance to win an iTunes voucher.

Here’s how it works:

  • Anyone may add a comment on this post to nominate their Stat of the Week candidate before midday Friday August 17 2012.
  • Statistics can be bad, exemplary or fascinating.
  • The statistic must be in the NZ media during the period of August 11 – 17 2012 inclusive.
  • Quote the statistic, when and where it was published and tell us why it should be our Stat of the Week.

Next Monday at midday we’ll announce the winner of this week’s Stat of the Week competition, and start a new one.

(more…)

August 9, 2012

NRL Predictions, Round 23

Team Ratings for Round 23

Here are the team ratings prior to Round 23, along with the ratings at the start of the season. I have created a brief description of the method I use for predicting rugby games. Go to my Department home page to see this.

Current Rating Rating at Season Start Difference
Bulldogs 9.31 -1.86 11.20
Rabbitohs 5.61 0.04 5.60
Storm 4.47 4.63 -0.20
Sea Eagles 3.11 9.83 -6.70
Cowboys 2.40 -1.32 3.70
Knights 0.90 0.77 0.10
Wests Tigers -0.22 4.52 -4.70
Titans -0.44 -11.80 11.40
Sharks -0.63 -7.97 7.30
Broncos -0.70 5.57 -6.30
Warriors -0.93 5.28 -6.20
Raiders -3.12 -8.40 5.30
Dragons -3.59 4.36 -7.90
Roosters -5.66 0.25 -5.90
Eels -5.88 -4.23 -1.60
Panthers -8.38 -3.40 -5.00

 

Performance So Far

So far there have been 160 matches played, 90 of which were correctly predicted, a success rate of 56.25%.

Here are the predictions for last week’s games.

Game Date Score Prediction Correct
1 Roosters vs. Dragons Aug 03 26 – 10 -0.16 FALSE
2 Storm vs. Panthers Aug 04 46 – 6 13.04 TRUE
3 Knights vs. Bulldogs Aug 04 10 – 26 -1.61 TRUE
4 Cowboys vs. Sea Eagles Aug 04 6 – 8 4.90 FALSE
5 Warriors vs. Sharks Aug 05 4 – 45 12.81 FALSE
6 Raiders vs. Broncos Aug 05 28 – 12 -0.57 FALSE
7 Titans vs. Rabbitohs Aug 05 18 – 22 -1.09 TRUE
8 Wests Tigers vs. Eels Aug 06 51 – 26 7.33 TRUE

 

Predictions for Round 23

Here are the predictions for Round 23

Game Date Winner Prediction
1 Rabbitohs vs. Sea Eagles Aug 10 Rabbitohs 2.50
2 Storm vs. Titans Aug 10 Storm 9.40
3 Eels vs. Roosters Aug 11 Eels 4.30
4 Wests Tigers vs. Dragons Aug 11 Wests Tigers 7.90
5 Cowboys vs. Warriors Aug 11 Cowboys 7.80
6 Panthers vs. Raiders Aug 12 Raiders -0.80
7 Bulldogs vs. Broncos Aug 12 Bulldogs 14.50
8 Knights vs. Sharks Aug 13 Knights 6.00

 

August 8, 2012

NZ troops more at risk abroad than at home

The Herald’s headline is “NZ troops more at risk at home than abroad”, but there’s the familiar problem with denominators.

Of more than 3500 injuries recorded between January 2011 and May 2012, 269 were suffered overseas, according to figures released to the Herald under the Official Information Act.

The majority of injuries are in NZ, because that’s where most NZDF staff time is spent.  At the moment, 343 NZDF personnel are on operations and UN missions, and 553 on other overseas deployments.  That’s from a total of 11891 military personnel and 2455 (equivalent full time) civilian staff (annual report, p13).  So, just over 6% of NZDF staff  are deployed overseas, and they get 7.7% of the reported injuries.   They are at more risk overseas, even if you lump together minor sporting injuries with deaths from enemy action.     That’s what you would expect, and it’s what Lt General Rhys Jones is quoted as saying.

Ignoring the denominators misses out the opportunity to comment on the real differences: it’s a bit surprising that being deployed doesn’t increase the injury risk more, but the increase in serious and fatal injuries is probably masked by the noise of miscellaneous exercise-related injury.