Posts filed under General (3156)

May 12, 2014

Don’t sniff the water

Q: Did you see “Cocaine now on tap in British homes” in the Herald

A: Yes.

Q: Is it true?

A: Not so as you’d notice.

Q: Didn’t they find traces of cocaine in drinking water?

A: Up to a point.

Q: You mean no?

A: I mean they found traces of the chemical that cocaine gets broken down into

Q: And is that a drug?

A: Not really. It was one component of an unsuccessful treatment for back pain. It is restricted, because it can be turned into cocaine.

Q: How much of this stuff did they find?

A: Almost none. A few nanograms per litre

Q: What’s that in real numbers? If it was really cocaine, how long would it take you to get one dose if you drank  eight glasses of water a day like the doctors recommend?

A: That isn’t actually what the doctors recommend.

Q: Well, then, “like the doctors don’t recommend?”

A: Several centuries.

Q: How can they detect such tiny amounts?

A: They use liquid chromatography to separate out each chemical, and then mass spectroscopy to basically count the molecules.

Q: Ok, impressed now.  The story also mentions “significant amounts of caffeine”. What does that mean?

A: It means “insignificant amounts”, about a million times lower concentration than in a cup of decaffeinated coffee.

Q: At least this is new, though?

A: The same agency reported finding the cocaine metabolite in drinking water in 2011, based on measurements in 2009-10. (PDF, Table 6)

Q: Why is there a video of a drug bust in Spain embedded in the story?

A: Because technology.

 

May 11, 2014

Briefly

  • New York Times: In addition, however, “we are able to identify gay bars in Tehran. Moscow too,” said Pete Warden, a co-founder of Jetpac. The company does not want to do that, he added, but he does think it’s important that “we make people aware, get people talking about this.”
  • US spending on science, space, and technology correlates with Suicides by hanging, strangulation and suffocation (correlation 0.992)
  • Can you stop the Internet knowing you’re pregnant. Maybe?
  •  “I’m still a little embarrassed and feel it should be up to the scientists themselves to present the arguments for science.” Bill Bryson

 

May 10, 2014

How close is the nearest road in New Zealand?

Gareth Robins has answered this question with a very beautiful visualization generated with a surprisingly compact piece of R code.

Distance to the nearest road in New Zealand

Distance to the nearest road in New Zealand

Check out the full size image and the coded here.

May 9, 2014

Seeking case-study material for journo unit standard

As many of you will know, I’m on the working group developing the content of a unit standard in statistical concepts for the National Diploma in Applied Journalism, which journalists with basic qualifications pursue while on the job to extend their skills.

It’s now time for me to ask you to send New Zealand examples of well-written statistically-based stories and poorly-written statistically-based stories that we can use. BUT you need to be able to send me the source data and an explanation (however rough) of what’s wrong with the story and how it could be improved.

I think that teachers may have existing examples that might do, and I would love to see them. You can email me your juicy contributions to statschat@gmail.com.

May 8, 2014

Briefly

 

May 7, 2014

Super 15 Predictions for Round 13

Team Ratings for Round 13

The basic method is described on my Department home page. I have made some changes to the methodology this year, including shrinking the ratings between seasons.

Here are the team ratings prior to this week’s games, along with the ratings at the start of the season.

Current Rating Rating at Season Start Difference
Crusaders 8.08 8.80 -0.70
Sharks 5.49 4.57 0.90
Chiefs 4.24 4.38 -0.10
Brumbies 4.08 4.12 -0.00
Waratahs 3.05 1.67 1.40
Bulls 1.99 4.87 -2.90
Hurricanes 1.63 -1.44 3.10
Blues -0.10 -1.92 1.80
Stormers -0.21 4.38 -4.60
Highlanders -1.71 -4.48 2.80
Force -2.36 -5.37 3.00
Reds -2.86 0.58 -3.40
Cheetahs -2.90 0.12 -3.00
Rebels -4.74 -6.36 1.60
Lions -6.69 -6.93 0.20

 

Performance So Far

So far there have been 74 matches played, 48 of which were correctly predicted, a success rate of 64.9%.

Here are the predictions for last week’s games.

Game Date Score Prediction Correct
1 Blues vs. Reds May 02 44 – 14 3.70 TRUE
2 Rebels vs. Sharks May 02 16 – 22 -6.30 TRUE
3 Crusaders vs. Brumbies May 03 40 – 20 6.30 TRUE
4 Chiefs vs. Lions May 03 38 – 8 12.90 TRUE
5 Waratahs vs. Hurricanes May 03 39 – 30 4.80 TRUE
6 Stormers vs. Highlanders May 03 29 – 28 6.20 TRUE
7 Bulls vs. Cheetahs May 03 26 – 21 7.80 TRUE

 

Predictions for Round 13

Here are the predictions for Round 13. The prediction is my estimated expected points difference with a positive margin being a win to the home team, and a negative margin a win to the away team.

Game Date Winner Prediction
1 Chiefs vs. Blues May 09 Chiefs 6.80
2 Rebels vs. Hurricanes May 09 Hurricanes -2.40
3 Highlanders vs. Lions May 10 Highlanders 9.00
4 Brumbies vs. Sharks May 10 Brumbies 2.60
5 Cheetahs vs. Force May 10 Cheetahs 3.50
6 Bulls vs. Stormers May 10 Bulls 4.70
7 Reds vs. Crusaders May 11 Crusaders -6.90

 

May 6, 2014

Privacy vs. sharing data for the public good – have your say

The New Zealand Data Futures Forum was established by the Ministers of Finance and Statistics to have a balanced conversation with New Zealand about the opportunities, risks and benefits of sharing data.

It is particularly keen that people have a say about the potential sharing of big data (information captured through instruments, sensors, internet transactions, email, video, click streams, and other digital activity) held by public and private-sector organisations. How do individuals control their own information and identity while at the same time creating an environment where data can be harnessed for public and economic good?

The Forum will be active until the end of June this year. To post a comment go to https://www.nzdatafutures.org.nz/have-your-say

 

Stories with data

From Harvard Business Review, 10 kinds of stories to tell with data

For almost a decade I have heard that good quantitative analysts can “tell a story with data.” Narrative is—along with visual analytics—an important way to communicate analytical results to non-analytical people. Very few people would question the value of such stories, but just knowing that they work is not much help to anyone trying to master the art of analytical storytelling. What’s needed is a framework for understanding the different kinds of stories that data and analytics can tell. If you don’t know what kind of story you want to tell, you probably won’t tell a good one.

 

May 2, 2014

Excellent display of sampling error by New York Times

 

To help with interpreting trends in unemployment, the New York Times has two animated bar charts showing the impact of sampling uncertainty. Here’s a snapshot of one of them (click for the real thing)

jobs

 

There’s a lot of uncertainty in ‘job growth’ figures from a single month, and a lot more uncertainty in month to month changes in estimates of job growth.

April 30, 2014

NRL Predictions for Round 9

Team Ratings for Round 9

The basic method is described on my Department home page. I have made some changes to the methodology this year, including shrinking the ratings between seasons.

Here are the team ratings prior to this week’s games, along with the ratings at the start of the season.

Current Rating Rating at Season Start Difference
Roosters 8.71 12.35 -3.60
Sea Eagles 7.52 9.10 -1.60
Bulldogs 6.08 2.46 3.60
Rabbitohs 6.03 5.82 0.20
Cowboys 4.19 6.01 -1.80
Titans 1.67 1.45 0.20
Broncos 0.92 -4.69 5.60
Knights 0.63 5.23 -4.60
Storm 0.15 7.64 -7.50
Panthers -2.77 -2.48 -0.30
Sharks -2.85 2.32 -5.20
Warriors -3.50 -0.72 -2.80
Wests Tigers -5.35 -11.26 5.90
Dragons -5.95 -7.57 1.60
Raiders -6.78 -8.99 2.20
Eels -10.50 -18.45 8.00

 

Performance So Far

So far there have been 64 matches played, 35 of which were correctly predicted, a success rate of 54.7%.

Here are the predictions for last week’s games.

Game Date Score Prediction Correct
1 Dragons vs. Roosters Apr 25 14 – 34 -7.90 TRUE
2 Storm vs. Warriors Apr 25 10 – 16 11.30 FALSE
3 Broncos vs. Rabbitohs Apr 25 26 – 28 -0.20 TRUE
4 Sharks vs. Panthers Apr 26 24 – 20 4.60 TRUE
5 Cowboys vs. Eels Apr 26 42 – 14 17.10 TRUE
6 Bulldogs vs. Knights Apr 26 16 – 12 11.40 TRUE
7 Sea Eagles vs. Raiders Apr 27 54 – 18 15.10 TRUE
8 Wests Tigers vs. Titans Apr 27 6 – 22 0.50 FALSE

 

Predictions for Round 9

Here are the predictions for Round 9. The prediction is my estimated expected points difference with a positive margin being a win to the home team, and a negative margin a win to the away team.

Game Date Winner Prediction
1 Roosters vs. Wests Tigers May 09 Roosters 18.60
2 Cowboys vs. Broncos May 09 Cowboys 7.80
3 Warriors vs. Raiders May 10 Warriors 7.80
4 Titans vs. Rabbitohs May 10 Titans 0.10
5 Storm vs. Sea Eagles May 10 Sea Eagles -2.90
6 Knights vs. Panthers May 11 Knights 7.90
7 Dragons vs. Bulldogs May 11 Bulldogs -7.50
8 Eels vs. Sharks May 12 Sharks -3.20